Developing Awareness of Food Hygiene

Developing Aw arness of feed HygieneTanisha RaybeHEALTH PROMOTION ESSAY ABOUT AWARENESS OF nutriment HYGIENE.GROUP MEMBERS WERE Tanisha Raybe, Caroline Veerasamy, Charlotte Chalmers , Hannah Firth and Stacey Rimes.INTRODUCTIONThis essay will seek to cotton up the importance of aliment hygiene, it will include epidemiology, demography data on board pose groups and health policies. It will seek to evaluate the effectiveness of a health forum and illust regularize the role of a health booster unitASSESSMENT OF HEALTH NEEDThere has been growing recognition that highlights the imp overishment for to a greater extent sense of aliment hygiene. This was evident in the increase rate of unwholesomeness and mortality of sustenanceborne sicknesses in the united Kingdom and world astray (World comfortablyness Organisation, 2007). This prompted governing bodies to positioning to a greater extent emphasis on regimen natural rubber practices. However, despite their efforts v ictuals borne nausea incidence continues to increase in come attracting media attentions two nationally and world(prenominal)ly (Arendt, Paez and Strohbehn, 2013). The aim of nutrition hygiene is to tell nutrient is free from physical, chemical and biological contamination which is overall unhurt for consumption (Who, 2002).An epidemiology study carried out by The Department of Environment of feed and rural affairs (2013) gave an insight into the effect of diet borne unhealthiness. They reported that, in that location were over a meg cases of nutrition borne illness in the United Kingdom each social class as a pull up stakes of low diet hygiene. This amounts to 20,000 hospital ad rushs and 500 deaths. nutrition Standard Agency (2011) collated that in England and wales each year there were around 1.7 million cases of food for thought borne illness that is 33160 cases each week. Additionally, the Centre for infirmity control and prevention (2011) reports that ea ch year approximately 1 in 6 American that is 48 million raft being sick , hospitalised or permit died from food borne illness. and the FSA, (2011) highlighted that the statistics presented above only represents the reported amounts of incidence, hence underestimating the true prize out of food borne illness.In light of the test presented above, underscore that poor food hygiene is a satisfying health issue that leads in mortality, morbidity and hospital accesss (WHO, 2007). Moreover, the economical burden cause by the prevalence of food borne illness which toll 1.5 million to treat. feed borne illness is prevent equal to(p), however some consumer believes that food borne illness is acquired by take in out whether from a restaurant or from a fast food outlet (Ackerley, 2013). However, by line of descent Zablostsky Kufel el al (2011) argued that large outbreaks of food borne illness argon loosely attributed to poor hygiene practices carried out within the homes. This they mentioned was due to lack of consciousness virtually what actually cause food borne illness. These they mentioned were wrong cooking procedures , provider providing food that confine been contaminated and lastly the involvement of hazardy eating behaviour of raw and undercook meat. FSA, 2011 states that it is everyones responsibility to ensure that the food that is supplied, vigilant and eaten is suited for consumption as lay out in the insurance on food safety. Also consumers do not readily approve that they may have caught food borne illness as a result of poor hygiene practices (FSA, 2011). A research carried out by (WHO, 2013) indicated that although everyone is at risk of food borne illness pregnant women , elderly , children and the immune deficiency are more susceptible to food borne illness . FSA ,2013 highlight that, more attentions should be place on education and training to reiterate to the planetary public about the common vehicle that cause pathogens le ading to stomach flu and food poisoning. In addition, educating them that although some hazards are obvious factor for food poisoning, there are some not so apparent and the con orders takes duration to manifest itself. For instance, food that are improperly stored, cooked or poor labelling as intimately as out of date, this can have a deadly effect on the body (Griffith, 2010).Yet although food safety mess durations are spreading in the UK and world(a)ly the implementation is quite challenging for many. Yiannas, 2008 states that in order to improve food safety there must be a change in concourses behaviour. However ever-changing consumer behaviour is more complex than merely educating them as habits formulated over a long period of time energy be terrible to break (Ackerley, 2011). For cause, A study carried out in China indicated that food safety incidents was a result of social behaviour rather than natural factor, this was due to their abuse of food additives (Qiang et al , 2011 Ouyang,2011). Consumers need to be taught the benefits of changing behaviour against the consequences of food borne illness (Ackerley, 2013). Therefore, it is imperative that education be the central point in changing multitudes behaviour when it comes to food hygiene practices (Mullan Wrong, 2010).Cultural, gender, belief and age may play a significant role in food borne illness (Ackerley, 2013). For instance, in some countries economic is taught in school as part of the educational curriculum allowing pupils to check out about the importance of food hygiene from a young age (Powell chapman ,2011). Also some culture support females to be mainly trusty for the preparation of meals within in the home (Yiannas,2009) . Moreover, this could eliminate other family members acquisition the importance of food hygiene (Yiannas,2009).PolicyGiven the growing evidence of food borne illness this has erode consumers self-confidence in giving medication ability to protect them from food borne illness. However this prompted Government organisation such(prenominal) as nutrient Standard Agency , Health Protection Agency, international melt down company like WHO to put more measures in place to prevent food borne illness that is identifiable by the public (FSA,2011) .Their mission is to create an awareness of food hygiene through education by engaging the public in discussion about and implementation of food safety practices. The information stipulated within the policies are set out in a comprehensive manner that seeks to give practical advice as well as mastermind concerns the general public have or encountered (FSA,2011). For example, WHO (2012) identifies tail fin key ways to prevent the spreading of food borne illness which are keep clean ,cook thoroughly ,safe temperatures, safe water and raw somatic and lastly the separation of raw and cooked product. The National health gift campaign (2009) highlights the importance of effective hand washing as it is one of the about effective ways to prevent food borne illness. The government also highlighted that hydrofoil about food borne illness, educational programs, surveillance and inspection system for food safety is key to prevent increase in food borne illness ( Hird et al, 2009).Based on evidences relating to the increase of foodborne illness and the rising economic cost of treating illness (FSA, 2013). The experts such as Government, policy needr and health victor decided that more postulate to be do about the awareness of food borne illness this coincided with Bradshaws (1972) needs. Bradshaw suggested there are four types of needs expressed, felt, prescriptive and comparative needs. However, as the needs were place by the experts normative need was more applicable to address the issue of food borne illness. For, example Rayner Scarborough (2005) argued that food borne illness is quite significant as it can have a major impact on a persons health. They highlighted tha t compared to other illness say smoking that is hugely advertised in comparison to hygiene which has the same risk of mortality, morbidity hospital admission and increased burden on the NHS resources.APPROACHYang (2012) suggested that education coupled with implementing effectual kitchen hygiene could reduce the number of illness and death. Seedhouse (2001) concurs with this statement stating that if the public is brainiaced(p) the right information and resources people are far more undecided and incline to change their behaviour to achieve food safety practices .The educational approach was chosen as it reflected the most effective means to express a pass on to the public to empower change. Scriven (2010) points out that the goal of an educational approach is to give adequate information to ensure the public have gain enough knowledge and extrapolateing as well as skills to make informed decision. It is important to considerate the different ways people learn as suggested by Honey and Mumford who highlighted four learning styles videlicet activist, reflector theorist and lastly pragmatist (Honey Mumford, 1986).The strength of the educational approach is that information is provided to aid consumer to make the best possible choice. However, freedom of choice may not engage in the public favour as they might not be incline to change their behaviour toward food hygiene ( Simnet,2010) .The aims and objects were obtained by using the acronym Smart which stands for specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time bound. This was then illustrated by the followingsAt the end of five minutes the participants will be able to identifiedTwo sources of pathogen that can cause food borne illness twain ways to prevent food borne illnessTwo symptoms of food borne illnessEVALUATIONAccording to Scriven (2010) evaluation is reaching a judgement about a significance particular task by critically analysing both strengths and weakness. The aim of the forum was to cre ate an awareness of food hygiene through education on the importance of food hygiene as well as gather feedback to inform future knowledge. The group followed a sequence that was effective to analyse evaluation which were process, impact and outcome (Naidoo Wills ,2009).The group ensured there were enough educational tools incorporated to reinforce the pass along and took into consideration how people learn .This forum comprised of posters, leaflets, brochures, interactive games, souvenir, and show and explain demonstration. The group work together in a cohesive manner which was evident in their organisation and how the message was conveyed . As Yang et al (2012) states that teamworks is beneficial for schoolchilds nurses as it helps them to develop their conference skills among others.The group presented the information in a clear, succinct manner and was not judgemental, bearing in mind they only had five minutes to get the message across. This was in concord with (Scriven, 2 010) who states that an effective communication should be free from ambiguous language.The group target university student from the age of 18- 25 as they were particularly more twisting in risky behaviour than any other groups at risk ( Abbott , 2009). This was due to lack of knowledge of food safety and them being external from home for the very first time ( Mullan Wrong , 2010 Phillp Anita , 2010). However, as the solar day progressed the group found that the message reach not only university student but everyone.ImpactDuring the forum it became common knowledge to the group that there were gaps in the public knowledge pertaining to food hygiene .This was identified as the group applied a strategy to find out what the public already knew about food hygiene. It became apparent that many had a dark sense of confidence in terms of food hygiene and did not realise that some of the practices they carried out could actually increase their chances of acquiring food borne illness. For instance, the bacteria that is present in rice if not stored properly (FSA, 2011). This happens to be one of the group most take home message as it was firsthand knowledge to many. The group was successful in conveying the message as a total of 92% gathered from the questionnaire was found to be quite receptive to the information and mentioned the information gleaned will have a bearing on their future practices. However, the group conceded as to what could have done to reach the further 8% of the population.Outcome evaluationThe group identified few strengths and weakness resulting from the health forum. Although the message was well received and the educational tool used appropriate, The group found that it would be hard to make contact with the same people around six months time to measure whether their practices has been influence by the health forum was very unlikely . However, it was observe that some of the posters and materials could have been in larger print to enable to the paper to be legible.The group believe it would be more practical and practicable to have the forum in a supermarket to attract a wide range of consumer. They found that time constraints was another issues as they only had a limited amount of time to deliver a message which could result in miss opportunity to reach more of the general public. eventually they found that the area was noisy with other forum and events happening at the same time and was quite distracting for both themselves and the audience.A health shoplifter has an important role to play in educating the public ( Scriven ,2010) .He or she should be a genuine communicator providing information that is simple but effective. They need to understand how people learn and receive information as well as take into consideration any barriers that may prevent a message from getting across. REF For instance, language, environment factor , culture and , beliefs . Houghton, 2008 states that an awareness of peoples ethni city and cultures needs plays an important role in achieving a good outcome when educating people on food hygiene.The increased numbers of foodborne illness illustrates that it is a significant health problem that warrant the need for more awareness of food hygiene in order to reduce the number of incidents , death and associated cost accumulate. The need for more educational programme that address peoples behaviours as well as increased their food hygiene knowledge is seen as an effective way to reduce the effects of food borne illness.REFERENCESAbbott, M. J., Byrd-Bredbenner , C., Schaffner, D., Bruhn ,C. M. Blalock, L. (2009). Comparison of food safety cognitions and self reported food handling behaviours with observed food safety behaviours of young adults. European diary of Clinical Nutrition ,63 ,572-579.Ackerley, L. (2013). Mixed messages in food safety cleanup position us softly?. Perspectives In Public Health, 133(6), 296298.Arendt, S. W., Paez, P. Strohbehn, C. (2013) . pabulum safety practices and managers perceptions a qualitative study in hospitality. International journal Of Contemporary hospitality wariness, 25 (1), pp. 124139.Bradshaw,J. 1992. Taxanonomy of needs. Open University Press.Department for Environment food and Royal affairs (2013). food statistics pocketbook. Office of National Statistics.London.Food Standard Agency (2011). Foodborne disease strategy food.gov.uk/policy-advice/microbiology/fds/( last accessed twentieth April 2014).Food Standard Agency (2013) Food poisoning . Retrieved 21st April 2014 from http//bit.Ly/lixxByD .Food Standard Agency (2011) .Foodborne Disease dodge 2012-2015. An FSA Programme for the Reduction of Foodborne Disease in the UK. Available online at http//www.food.gov.uk/mulitimedia/pdfs/fds2015.pdf (last accessed 20th April 2014).Griffith, C. J. (2010). Food Safety Culture Creating a Behaviour-based Food Safety Management System. British Food Journal, 112 (4), pp. 457458.Hird,S., Stein,C.,Kiamarz,P.,N anda,A.Havelaan,AH.(2009). Estimating the global burden of food borne disease A collaborative effort. Eurosurvellance 14(18),1-4.Honey, P. Mumford, A. (1986) Using your learning styles. (2nd ed.). Bershire Printique, Maidedenhead.Houghton,G. (2008) Women seeking asylum are communication needs being met? British Journal of Midwifery 16 (3) 142.Lam, H., Remais, J., Fung, M., Xu, L., Sun, S. (2013). Food supply and food safety issues in China. The Lancet, 381(9882), 20442053.Mullan, B. Wong, C. (2010). Using the Theory of think Behaviour to design a food hygiene intervention. Food Control, 21 (11), pp. 15241529Naidoo, J. Will,J.(2009). Foundations for Health Promotion . Edinburgh BailliereTindall Elsevier.NHS Hand Hygiene Campaign (2009). Consequences of poor hand hygiene and the importance of handwashing. http//bit.L/lgeQNgQ ( Accessed 21,April 2014).Phillip, S. Anita, E. (2010). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour deterrent example in predicting safe food handling pr actices. Food Control, 21 (7), pp. 983987.Powell, D. A., Jacob, C. J. Chapman, B. J. (2011). Enhancing food safety culture to reduce rates of foodborne illness. Food Control, 22 (6), pp. 817822.Qiang , L ., Wen, L., Jing, W. Yue,D. (2011). Application of content analysis in food safety reports on the internet in china . Food Control 22, (2) 252- 256.Quyang,H.Y. (2011). Nearly 70 percent of the respondents felt insecure about food . 2010- 2011 Reports on consumer confidence in food safety . Insight China ,1 42- 45.Rayer ,M. Scarborough, P. ( 2005). The burden of food related ill health in the UK .Community Health Journal, 59 (12) 1054 1057.Scriven, A. (2010). Promoting health A Practical guide . (6th ed.). Edinburgh Bailliere Tindall.Seedhouse,D. (2001). Health The foundations for achievement .(2nd ed.). Chichester Wiley Son.Stable,Joy. (2009). Caring for honest-to-goodness Jews. Nursing and Residential Care,11(12) 621- 623.World health organisation (2012) five keys to safer kee ps . Retrieved 20 , April, 2014 from // www.who int/foodsafety/publications/ consumer/en/5keys _ en pdf.World Health Organization (2013). Facts on Food safety. Retrieved 22, April, 2014, from http//www.who.int/features/factfiles/food_safety/facts/en/index6.htmlWorld health Organisation . Food safety and food illness fact sheet. Retrieved 22 , April , 2014, from www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheet/fs237/en/.World health organisation. (2002). Who global strategy for safety , safer food for better health.Yang ,K.,wooner,R.,G Matthews, T.J.(2012). Collaborate learning among undergrad students in community health nursing .Nursing Education in workout ,12 (2), 72-76.Yiannas, F. (2009), Food Safety Culture Creating a Behaviour Based Food Safety Management System, Springer, New York, NY.Zablotsky Kufel, J. S., Resnick, B. A., Fox, M. A., Mcgready, J., Yager, J. P. Burke, T. A. (2011). The impact of local environmental health capacity on foodborne illness morbidity in Maryland. American Jo urnal Of Public Health, 101 (8).